{"id":114,"date":"2004-10-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-10-04T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"\/blog\/?p=114"},"modified":"2011-03-25T21:48:01","modified_gmt":"2011-03-25T20:48:01","slug":"it-s_my_aeropl__helicopter_","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.polom.org\/blog\/posts\/114\/it-s_my_aeropl__helicopter_","title":{"rendered":"It&rsquo;s my aeropl&#8230; helicopter :)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/imports\/helicopter-playmobil_en_vol-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Je vous entends d\u00e9j\u00e0 vous demander ce que ceci fait sur un site photo au lieu d&rsquo;\u00eatre sur un site consacr\u00e9 aux trucages num\u00e9riques. Et pourtant, il s&rsquo;agit bien d&rsquo;une photo, presque traditionnelle, presque sans trucage. La seule performance num\u00e9rique a consist\u00e9 \u00e0 enlever la main tenant le jouet ; contrairement \u00e0 ce qui semble \u00e9vident \u00e0 premi\u00e8re vue je n&rsquo;ai pas fait de trucage pour donner l&rsquo;impression que le rotor tourne et que le paysage d\u00e9file. Tout \u00e7a c&rsquo;est de la photo traditionnelle :))<br \/>\nCa n&rsquo;en fait pas quelque chose de passionnant d&rsquo;un point de vue photographique mais c&rsquo;est une plaisanterie qui m&rsquo;amuse.<\/p>\n<p><em>Note to my english-speaking readers : I can&rsquo;t promise I&rsquo;ll allways translate my messages but I&rsquo;ll try. Let&rsquo;s start with this one&#8230;<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em> <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>I can hear you wonder what this picture has to do with photography when (you think) it should illustrate digital image manipulations theory. Well, no&#8230; this is (almost) pure photography. The only digital stunt was to remove the hand holding the toy. The movement blur on the rotor and in the background is real and was not digitally faked.<br \/>\nThis doesn&rsquo;t turn this picture in a photography masterpiece but this makes me laugh \ud83d\ude42<br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Marc.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>C&rsquo;est bien une photo.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.polom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.polom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.polom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.polom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.polom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.polom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1619,"href":"https:\/\/www.polom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114\/revisions\/1619"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.polom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.polom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=114"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.polom.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=114"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}